I like to keep a tidy mind. But history is messy! In fact, history records stupefy! And day after day, my mind becomes messier and messier. And kilometre after kilometre I become dumber and dumber! What to do?
The trick, I figure out, is too uncover just enough. Pick up the trend. And sweep out the rest. Quickly. Smartly!
Dynasty after dynasty drops antiquity after antiquity. We see them in Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand.
I set to work. Spring clean my mind. Dust, then sweep, then wipe. Everything in its place, shiny and bright.
And out of this dust, rises a history lesson! Power shifts … always.
Super powers spread themselves too far and too thin. And there in the wings waits a contender. Lao Dynasties dominate in the early centuries. Then Myanmar’s Bagan rules South East Asia. Cambodia’s Angkor conquers them all in the 12th and 13th centuries. Next Thailand’s Ayuthaya reigns supreme. And then back to Myanmar and Mrauk U. Power shifts … always.
Here is a nice and tidy snapshot of my mind today.
I hope the historians, amongst us (psst – Wendy), forgive my domestic zeal.
Here are Harry’s photos, squeaky clean of fact and figure. Just 3 or 4 or 5 of each dynasty. Except for Angkor! The greatest of ancient civilisations in South East Asia. Angkor bags 20 photos.
All in chronological order, of course.
An Iron Age Empire (Laos): 5th BC to 5th AD with its heyday in 5th AD century. Little is known about this civilisation. But its many Plains of Jars intrigue ….

In central Laos, near Phonosavan, there are the Plains of Jars. They date back to the Iron Age (500 BC to 500 AD).

Amidst these jars you see many craters felt by the bombs that fell during the Vietnam War. Huge craters – I provide an indication of scale.
The Wat Phou Empire (Laos): 6th to 9th AD with its heyday in 9th century.

In south Laos, near Champasak, is the World Heritage Site of Wat Phou. Temples, palaces, reservoirs from a ruling dynasty – 6th to 12th centuries.

Perfect symmetry all the way from its heyday in the 8-9th century. The view from the top … almost everything comes in two …
The Bagan Empire (Myanmar): 11th to 13th with its heyday in 12th century.

In central Myanmar, Bagan is the first capital of Burmese Kings. Here there are more than 4000 Buddhist temples from the 11 to 12th century.
The Angkor Empire (Cambodia): 9th to 15th AD with it’s heyday in the 14th century.

In west Cambodia, the world famous Angkor. Here a beautiful higgledy piggledy temple complex. See the many faces …

… and evil (these guys). This tug of war carving is repeated often and is called … the Churning of the Ocean of Milk …

A French missionary discovers the ruins in 1872 … parts of Angkor have been left as he found them way back then.
The Ayuthaya Empire (Thailand): 16th and 17th AD with its heyday in 17th century.

In Thailand, 80 km north of Bangkok, is Ayuthaya, created in 1351. By 1685 it has 1 million people, double the population of London at the time.

Ayuthaya has moats, channels and a river to the sea. It is very progressive. There are concession areas for all the main seafaring nations.

A famous shot … a Buddha head, fallen off and trapped by the roots of the Boddhi tree (ironic – the same tree type under which he received enlightenment).
The Mrauk U Empire (Myanmar): 17th and 18th AD with its heyday in 18th century.

In west Myanmar is Mrauk U. Another dynasty, builds in the 17th century a temple complex. It has a free port and traders back then liken it to Venice.
Great overview of a little known region for me. Safe journey and look forward to the next instalment
Again—-amazing facts and pictures—-most revealing—thank you !!
Yes: A wonderful composition. In fact you have a very tidy mind. Hstory however by nature, as you showed, is messy! Many Archeologists, Etnomologists or what ever other -ologists will never see what you and Harry have seen. The power of the jungle in these hot and humid climes is so impressive, seeing how it overpowers the works of man. Very interesting too for me, are the Burmese and Thai trading towns with access to the see and the concessions – defined areas where they could settle and trade – are fascinating. Were those from Europe i.e. Portuguese, Dutch, British and French all there, or only a few? May be the Chinese too and even other Asian people. One wonders. Once again THANK YOU! JAN
Wonderfully composed. I loved them all and in particular the power of the roots of the trees Gail